Hello Kees,
>> +run_crash:
>> + @sh pstore_crash_test || echo "pstore_crash_test: [FAIL]"
>
> This is probably better written to exit 1 on failure, otherwise it
> just _says_ it fails. (Though lots of selftests in the tree already
> have this problem, it's best to avoid the pattern for new stuff.)
> Maybe something like:
>
> @sh pstore_crash_test || { echo "pstore_crash_test: [FAIL]";
exit 1; }
OK. I'll add the "exit 1".
>> +prlog -n "Checking dmesg files exist in pstore filesystem ... "
>> +if [ -e dmesg-${backend}-0 ]; then
>> + prlog "ok"
>> + for f in `ls dmesg-${backend}-*`; do
>> + prlog -e "\t${f}"
>> + done
>> +else
>> + prlog "FAIL"
>> + rc=1
>> +fi
>
> This test pattern is repeated a lot. Maybe better to create a helper
> function instead? It could make the tests much more readable.
Yes, I should make a helper function in v2.
Best regards,
Hiraku Toyooka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
