On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 11:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:11:22 +0000 (GMT)
> Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > 2.6.19-rc5-mm2
> > > 
> > > Am seeing errors with systems using ext2. First machine is a plan old x86
> > > using initramfs. Console output looks like;
> > > ...
> > > Configuring network interfaces...BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
> > > ...
> > >  [<c01b3b80>] ext2_try_to_allocate+0xdb/0x152
> > >  [<c01b3e72>] ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv+0x4b/0x1b2
> > > 
> > > I've not investigated yet what patches might be at fault.
> > 
> > I expect you'll find it's
> > ext2-reservations-bring-ext2-reservations-code-in-line-with-latest-ext3.patch
> > which gets stuck in a loop there for me too: back it out and all seems fine.
> > 
> > It's not obvious which part of the patch is to blame: mostly it's
> > cleanup, but a few variables do change size: I'm currently narrowing
> > down to where a fix is needed.
> > 
> 
> Doing s/-Wall/-W/ tends to shake out bugs in this stuff.
> 
> The below might help.
> 
> Sorry, I tested this well, then the cleanup patch was merged and I didn't
> get onto retesting :(
> 
> 
> 
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> 
>  fs/ext2/balloc.c |   33 +++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN 
> fs/ext2/balloc.c~ext2-reservations-bring-ext2-reservations-code-in-line-with-latest-ext3-fix
>  fs/ext2/balloc.c
> --- 
> a/fs/ext2/balloc.c~ext2-reservations-bring-ext2-reservations-code-in-line-with-latest-ext3-fix
> +++ a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> @@ -1155,9 +1155,10 @@ int ext2_new_blocks(struct inode *inode,

This is different from ext3.  Shouldn't the return value from
ext2_new_blocks() a ext2_fsblk_t type?

ext2_alloc_blocks() already thinks that ext2_new_blocks return unsigned
block number.


>       struct buffer_head *gdp_bh;
>       int group_no;
>       int goal_group;
> +     ext2_grpblk_t grp_target_blk;   /* blockgroup relative goal block */
> +     ext2_grpblk_t grp_alloc_blk;    /* blockgroup-relative allocated block*/
>       ext2_fsblk_t ret_block;         /* filesyetem-wide allocated block */
>       int bgi;                        /* blockgroup iteration index */
> -     int target_block;
>       int performed_allocation = 0;
>       ext2_grpblk_t free_blocks;      /* number of free blocks in a group */
>       struct super_block *sb;
> @@ -1230,14 +1231,15 @@ retry_alloc:
>               my_rsv = NULL;
> 
>       if (free_blocks > 0) {
> -             ret_block = ((goal - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block)) %
> +             grp_target_blk = ((goal - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block)) %
>                               EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>               bitmap_bh = read_block_bitmap(sb, group_no);
>               if (!bitmap_bh)
>                       goto io_error;
> -             ret_block = ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv(sb, group_no,
> -                                     bitmap_bh, ret_block, my_rsv, &num);
> -             if (ret_block >= 0)
> +             grp_alloc_blk = ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv(sb, group_no,
> +                                     bitmap_bh, grp_target_blk,
> +                                     my_rsv, &num);
> +             if (grp_alloc_blk >= 0)
>                       goto allocated;
>       }
> 
> @@ -1273,9 +1275,9 @@ retry_alloc:
>               /*
>                * try to allocate block(s) from this group, without a goal(-1).
>                */
> -             ret_block = ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv(sb, group_no,
> +             grp_alloc_blk = ext2_try_to_allocate_with_rsv(sb, group_no,
>                                       bitmap_bh, -1, my_rsv, &num);
> -             if (ret_block >= 0)
> +             if (grp_alloc_blk >= 0)
>                       goto allocated;
>       }
>       /*
> @@ -1299,25 +1301,20 @@ allocated:
>       ext2_debug("using block group %d(%d)\n",
>                       group_no, gdp->bg_free_blocks_count);
> 
> -     target_block = ret_block + group_no * EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)
> -                             + le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
> +     ret_block = grp_alloc_blk + ext2_group_first_block_no(sb, group_no);
> 
> -     if (in_range(le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_block_bitmap), target_block, num) ||
> -         in_range(le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_inode_bitmap), target_block, num) ||
> -         in_range(target_block, le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_inode_table),
> +     if (in_range(le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_block_bitmap), ret_block, num) ||
> +         in_range(le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_inode_bitmap), ret_block, num) ||
> +         in_range(ret_block, le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_inode_table),
>                     EXT2_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) ||
> -         in_range(target_block + num - 1, le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_inode_table),
> +         in_range(ret_block + num - 1, le32_to_cpu(gdp->bg_inode_table),
>                     EXT2_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group))
>               ext2_error(sb, "ext2_new_blocks",
>                           "Allocating block in system zone - "
> -                         "blocks from %u, length %lu", target_block, num);
> +                         "blocks from %u, length %lu", ret_block, num);
> 
>       performed_allocation = 1;
> 
> -
> -     /* ret_block was blockgroup-relative.  Now it becomes fs-relative */
> -     ret_block = target_block;
> -
>       if (ret_block + num - 1 >= le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
>               ext2_error(sb, "ext2_new_blocks",
>                           "block("E2FSBLK") >= blocks count(%d) - "
> _
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to