On Thursday 16 November 2006 17:52, Jiri Bohac wrote: > xtime is not properly incremented when main timer ticks are lost. > Whatever the number of ticks elapsed is, only one tick worth of time > is added to xtime. This patch fixes that.
Normally it is supposed to be called as often as there are missing ticks (e.g. see s390 implementation of noidletick). This is also true for non no idle tick - the hardware is not supposed to lose interrupts. You would need to change at least the existing noidletick implementations in tree too. Anyways, i'm sure it could be improved, but in .20 with dyntick everything will be different anyways. I don't think it makes sense to change now. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
