On Wed 16-09-15 20:00:00, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> Introduce is_via_compact_memory helper function indicating compacting
> via /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory to improve readability.
> 
> To catch this situation in __compaction_suitable, use order as parameter
> directly instead of using struct compact_control.
> 
> This patch has no functional changes.

This is a similar case as for the sysrq_oom. I do not like the name that
much though. I am not familiar with the compaction too much to help you
with a better name, unfortunatelly. Maybe is_global_compaction()...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/compaction.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index c5c627a..a8e6593 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1197,6 +1197,15 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct 
> zone *zone,
>       return cc->nr_migratepages ? ISOLATE_SUCCESS : ISOLATE_NONE;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
> + * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
> + */
> +static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
> +{
> +     return order == -1;
> +}
> +
>  static int __compact_finished(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>                           const int migratetype)
>  {
> @@ -1223,11 +1232,7 @@ static int __compact_finished(struct zone *zone, 
> struct compact_control *cc,
>               return COMPACT_COMPLETE;
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
> -      * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
> -      */
> -     if (cc->order == -1)
> +     if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
>               return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
>  
>       /* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
> @@ -1290,11 +1295,7 @@ static unsigned long __compaction_suitable(struct zone 
> *zone, int order,
>       int fragindex;
>       unsigned long watermark;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
> -      * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
> -      */
> -     if (order == -1)
> +     if (is_via_compact_memory(order))
>               return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
>  
>       watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone);
> @@ -1658,10 +1659,11 @@ static void __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct 
> compact_control *cc)
>                * this makes sure we compact the whole zone regardless of
>                * cached scanner positions.
>                */
> -             if (cc->order == -1)
> +             if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
>                       __reset_isolation_suitable(zone);
>  
> -             if (cc->order == -1 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
> +             if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order) ||
> +                             !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
>                       compact_zone(zone, cc);
>  
>               if (cc->order > 0) {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to