On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 03:29:25 PM Dan Carpenter wrote: > The intent was to test "proc[i].handler" instead of "proc->handler". > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c > index c1ff58d..6c0f079 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c > @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long > table_size, > for (i = 0; i < proc_num; i++) { > if (entry->type != proc[i].id) > continue; > - if (!proc->handler || proc[i].handler(entry, table_end)) > + if (!proc[i].handler || > + proc[i].handler(entry, table_end)) > return -EINVAL; > > proc->count++; > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Applied, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
