On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) "David Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ivan Mikhaylov <i...@ru.ibm.com> > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:22 +0400 > > > Register dump out work preventing with > > old ethtool + new driver and new ethtool + old driver. > > First of all you didn't provide a proper Signoff. > > Second of all, there was so much discussion about whether this does > or does not break things for various combinations of old/new ethtool > and kernel. > > Therefore I want a real detailed commit message that explains why this > is all OK. After so much confusion and discussion, providing a patch > with absolutely no commit message is completely inappropriate. David, my apologies for signoff and description, I admit that is inappropriate. Ben proposed one, is it eligible? Need I resubmit patch with sign and detailed description? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
