On Tue 22-09-15 15:16:32, Greg Thelen wrote:
> mem_cgroup_read_stat() returns a page count by summing per cpu page
> counters.  The summing is racy wrt. updates, so a transient negative sum
> is possible.  Callers don't want negative values:
> - mem_cgroup_wb_stats() doesn't want negative nr_dirty or nr_writeback.

OK, this can confuse dirty throttling AFAIU

> - oom reports and memory.stat shouldn't show confusing negative usage.

I guess this is not earth shattering.

> - tree_usage() already avoids negatives.
> 
> Avoid returning negative page counts from mem_cgroup_read_stat() and
> convert it to unsigned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <[email protected]>

I guess we want that for stable 4.2 because of the dirty throttling
part. Longterm we should use generic per-cpu counter.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

Thanks!

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 6ddaeba34e09..2633e9be4a99 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -644,12 +644,14 @@ mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct 
> mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Return page count for single (non recursive) @memcg.
> + *
>   * Implementation Note: reading percpu statistics for memcg.
>   *
>   * Both of vmstat[] and percpu_counter has threshold and do periodic
>   * synchronization to implement "quick" read. There are trade-off between
>   * reading cost and precision of value. Then, we may have a chance to 
> implement
> - * a periodic synchronizion of counter in memcg's counter.
> + * a periodic synchronization of counter in memcg's counter.
>   *
>   * But this _read() function is used for user interface now. The user 
> accounts
>   * memory usage by memory cgroup and he _always_ requires exact value because
> @@ -659,17 +661,24 @@ mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct 
> mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
>   *
>   * If there are kernel internal actions which can make use of some not-exact
>   * value, and reading all cpu value can be performance bottleneck in some
> - * common workload, threashold and synchonization as vmstat[] should be
> + * common workload, threashold and synchronization as vmstat[] should be
>   * implemented.
>   */
> -static long mem_cgroup_read_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> -                              enum mem_cgroup_stat_index idx)
> +static unsigned long
> +mem_cgroup_read_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum mem_cgroup_stat_index 
> idx)
>  {
>       long val = 0;
>       int cpu;
>  
> +     /* Per-cpu values can be negative, use a signed accumulator */
>       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>               val += per_cpu(memcg->stat->count[idx], cpu);
> +     /*
> +      * Summing races with updates, so val may be negative.  Avoid exposing
> +      * transient negative values.
> +      */
> +     if (val < 0)
> +             val = 0;
>       return val;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1254,7 +1263,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
>               for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
>                       if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
>                               continue;
> -                     pr_cont(" %s:%ldKB", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
> +                     pr_cont(" %s:%luKB", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
>                               K(mem_cgroup_read_stat(iter, i)));
>               }
>  
> @@ -2819,14 +2828,11 @@ static unsigned long tree_stat(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg,
>                              enum mem_cgroup_stat_index idx)
>  {
>       struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> -     long val = 0;
> +     unsigned long val = 0;
>  
> -     /* Per-cpu values can be negative, use a signed accumulator */
>       for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg)
>               val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(iter, idx);
>  
> -     if (val < 0) /* race ? */
> -             val = 0;
>       return val;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3169,7 +3175,7 @@ static int memcg_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>       for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
>               if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
>                       continue;
> -             seq_printf(m, "%s %ld\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
> +             seq_printf(m, "%s %lu\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
>                          mem_cgroup_read_stat(memcg, i) * PAGE_SIZE);
>       }
>  
> @@ -3194,13 +3200,13 @@ static int memcg_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void 
> *v)
>                          (u64)memsw * PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
> -             long long val = 0;
> +             unsigned long long val = 0;
>  
>               if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
>                       continue;
>               for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
>                       val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(mi, i) * PAGE_SIZE;
> -             seq_printf(m, "total_%s %lld\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i], val);
> +             seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i], val);
>       }
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_NSTATS; i++) {
> -- 
> 2.6.0.rc0.131.gf624c3d

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to