On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Paul E. McKenney > <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 08:28:39AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> as I have observed here some lockdep issues (one could be solved in > >> netdev) I wanted to try this patchset. > >> > >> Unfortunately, you cannot pull from... > >> > >> "These changes are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git > >> for-mingo > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 19a5ecde086a6a5287978b12ae948fa691b197b7: > >> > >> rcu: Suppress lockdep false positive for rcp->exp_funnel_mutex > >> (2015-09-20 21:01:22 -0700) > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Oleg Nesterov (1): > >> rcu: Change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around GCC bug 67055 > >> > >> Paul E. McKenney (1): > >> rcu: Suppress lockdep false positive for rcp->exp_funnel_mutex > >> > >> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 +++++------ > >> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 +++++ > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)" > >> > >> So, I have stolen them from linux-next.git. > >> > >> Please look at this, Thanks. > > > > Does it work better now? (Forgot to actually push the new name...) > > Hi Paul, > > now for-mingo Git branch has this two fixes.
Whew!!! Apologies for the hassle! > I just booted into my new kernel with the "stolen" rcu.fixes from -next. > > For the lockdep problems I will do a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y to see if > I get some more infos on the workqueue trouble. > > [ 23.874836] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > kernel/workqueue.c:2678 > [ 23.874902] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1411, name: acpid Did you get a stack trace? There are quite a few potential callers of start_flush_work() via flush_work(). > $ grep LOCKDEP /boot/config-4.3.0-rc2-438.1-llvmlinux-amd64 > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y > CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y > # CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP is not set > > So, CLANG is a bit different compiler :-). True enough. Good to have more than one, though. Thanx, Paul > Thanks for taking care. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > >> > >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144332758307978&w=2 > >> [2] > >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/patch/?id=66e8c57da6bf6b847a48a5a6fda59512f733ed78 > >> [3] > >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/patch/?id=19a5ecde086a6a5287978b12ae948fa691b197b7 > >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/