As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
needed, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com>
---
fs/hpfs/namei.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/hpfs/namei.c b/fs/hpfs/namei.c
index 9e92c9c..ae4d5a1 100644
--- a/fs/hpfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/hpfs/namei.c
@@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int hpfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry
*dentry, umode_t mode, de
int err;
if ((err = hpfs_chk_name(name, &len))) return err==-ENOENT ? -EINVAL :
err;
if (hpfs_sb(dir->i_sb)->sb_eas < 2) return -EPERM;
- if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
- return -EINVAL;
hpfs_lock(dir->i_sb);
err = -ENOSPC;
fnode = hpfs_alloc_fnode(dir->i_sb, hpfs_i(dir)->i_dno, &fno, &bh);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
