Looks good to me. Additional kudos for READ_ONCE'es. Data races are bad. Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:38:21AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> As reported by several people the bound checks in get_wchan() on x86/64bit >> are wrong. >> >> The following series addresses that problem and as a consequence >> unifies the needlessly different implementations of 32 and 64 bit. >> >> Thanks, >> >> tglx >> >> --- >> process.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> process_32.c | 28 ---------------------------- >> process_64.c | 24 ------------------------ >> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > Hohumm, looks good to me. Especially the documentation of the stack > layout and why we're doing all that dance. > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > Should we CC: stable? > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
