> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:37:32AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:28:41PM +0000, Meyer, Mike wrote: > > It looks like the sites in the wakeup path do indeed not get any additional > conditionals. > > > > My only comment is I am not sure about the naming of the flag > > > ENQUEUE_TEMP which implies (to me) the enqueue is temporary which > > > clearly it isn't. Maybe something like > DEQUEUE_MOVE/ENQUEUE_MOVE > > > would be a bit more descriptive of the use case. > > > > Yes, I ran out of creative juices, let me attempt a better name once > > I've woken up a bit. > > How about DEQUEUE_SAVE, ENQUEUE_RESTORE ? Ideally I'd wrap the whole > pattern into a helper but C isn't really supportive of pre+post patterns like > this.
Sounds fine to me! Thanks again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
