On 02/10/15 11:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> wrote:

The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
the wakeup.

This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags and uses newly
introduce PM wakeup APIs dev_pm_{set,clear}_wake_irq.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zu...@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com>
Cc: rtc-li...@googlegroups.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>

Looks correct to me.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>


Thanks, while you are at it, do you know what interrupt stv2_pl031
shares so that I can fix the TODO in the comment or the code(whichever
applicable).

Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to