As the firmware (or the hypervisor) may have disabled SRE access,
check that SRE can actually be enabled before declaring that we
do have that capability.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 3c9aed3..305f30dc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
+
 static bool
 feature_matches(u64 reg, const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
 {
@@ -45,11 +47,26 @@ __ID_FEAT_CHK(id_aa64pfr0);
 __ID_FEAT_CHK(id_aa64mmfr1);
 __ID_FEAT_CHK(id_aa64isar0);
 
+static bool has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
+{
+       bool has_sre;
+
+       if (!has_id_aa64pfr0_feature(entry))
+               return false;
+
+       has_sre = gic_enable_sre();
+       if (!has_sre)
+               pr_warn_once("%s present but disabled by higher exception 
level\n",
+                            entry->desc);
+
+       return has_sre;
+}
+
 static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
        {
                .desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
                .capability = ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF,
-               .matches = has_id_aa64pfr0_feature,
+               .matches = has_useable_gicv3_cpuif,
                .field_pos = 24,
                .min_field_value = 1,
        },
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to