Hi Balbi, >> John Feng-Hsin Chiang, can you confirm that from your side the >> fusbh200 driver can be deleted? >... but let's get this confirmation.
Yes, you can delete fusbh200. Best Regards, John Chiang -----Original Message----- From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2015 5:21 AM To: Peter Senna Tschudin Cc: John Feng-Hsin Chiang(江峰興); Yuan-Hsin Chen; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Alan Stern; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Laurent Pinchart; [email protected]; [email protected]; Rafał Miłecki; [email protected]; [email protected]; Sergei Shtylyov; Masanari Iida; Randy Dunlap; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-host: Remove fusbh200 driver Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:18:27PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: >>> fusbh200 and fotg210 are very similar. The initial idea was to >>> consolidate both drivers but I'm afraid fusbh200 is not being used. >>> >>> This patch remove the fusbh200 source code, update Kconfig and two >>> Makefiles. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]> >> >> after all this work on these previous patches, you just remove fusbh200 ? >> >> that's a bit odd. Are you sure there are no users for this driver ? >> It has been in tree since 2013. > I don't know about users, but I could not find devices using fusbh200. > The closest I got was: > > http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Digital-Video-Langzeit-Recorder-H264-DVR-3G-4-K > anal-/370525106495 > > But it only says: Main Processor: Faraday. I don't know which usb host > controller it uses. > > The idea of deleting fusbh200 came from contacting the driver authors. > I was asking where to find hw for testing, and I was told that the > fusbh200 driver can be deleted. Also at least Fedora and Ubuntu build > modules for these host controllers by default. If fusbh200 and fotg210 > are only available integrated into SOCs, maybe building the modules by > default for x86 is not a good idea. But if there are users I'll be > happy to continue the integration work, even better if I find hardware > for testing. fair enough, if can be deleted it's fine... > John Feng-Hsin Chiang, can you confirm that from your side the > fusbh200 driver can be deleted? ... but let's get this confirmation. > For the patches I sent, 10 of 14 are for fotg210 which I'll fix and resend. cool, thanks -- balbi N떑꿩�r툤y鉉싕b쾊Ф푤v�^�)頻{.n�+돴쪐{콗喩zX㎍썳變}찠꼿쟺�&j:+v돣�쳭喩zZ+�+zf＂톒쉱�~넮녬i鎬z� 췿ⅱ�?솳鈺�&�)刪f뷌^j푹y쬶끷@A첺뛴 0띠h��뭝
