On Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:25:27 PM Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 10/15/2015 09:05 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > The cpufreq sysfs interface had been a bit inconsistent as one of the > > CPUs for a policy had a real directory within its sysfs 'cpuX' directory > > and all other CPUs had links to it. That also made the code a bit > > complex as we need to take care of moving the sysfs directory if the CPU > > containing the real directory is getting physically hot-unplugged. > > > > Solve this by creating 'policyX' directories (per-policy) in > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ directory, where X is the CPU for which > > the policy was first created. > > > > This also removes the need of keeping kobj_cpu and we can remove it now. > > > > Suggested-by: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > > > Since you've added a separate patch for making policyX more consistent: > Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]> > > Btw, does a Review-by have an implicit Acked-by?
Yes it does, at least as far as I'm concerned. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
