On 10/15/2015 05:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/15/2015 04:07 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: >>> On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>>>>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like >>>>>> s390 >>>>>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers). >>>>>> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep >>>>>> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is >>>>>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) >>>>>> in >>>>>> the test. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> v3: >>>>>> - correctly set syscall number on native arm64. >>>>>> v2: >>>>>> - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing >>>>>> restart. >>>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next. >>>>> If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1 >>>> >>>> Yes please. :) >>>> >>> >>> ok. Please rebase to linux-kselftest next and resend the patch. >> >> Am I looking at the right tree? linux-kselftest#next doesn't appear to >> have the s390 patch that was included in 4.3. >> > > I see what happened. Your patch is linux-next fixes and that went into > 4.3-rc2. I can get linux-next rebase to 4.3-rc2 and get your patch in. > Thanks for clearing this up.
oops rebase linux-kselftest next i.e -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
