On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:21:51 -0500 Benjamin Poirier wrote: > real 13m35.065s > user 0m1.657s > sys 0m27.918s > > The test is not cpu bound; as Jay pointed out, it spends most of its > time sleeping.
Ugh, so it does multiple iterations of 118 sec? Could you send a patch to bump the timeout to 900 or 1200 in this case?
