On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
> validate_resctrl_feature_request() is used to test both if a resource is
> present in the info directory, and if a passed monitoring feature is
> present in the mon_features file.
>
> Refactor validate_resctrl_feature_request() into two smaller functions
> that each accomplish one check to give feature checking more
> granularity:
> - Resource directory presence in the /sys/fs/resctrl/info directory.
> - Feature name presence in the /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mon_features
> file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-ret...@intel.com>
> ---
> Changelog v4:
> - Roll back to using test_resource_feature_check() for CMT and MBA.
> (Ilpo).
>
> Changelog v3:
> - Move new function to a separate patch. (Reinette)
> - Rewrite resctrl_mon_feature_exists() only for L3_MON.
>
> Changelog v2:
> - Add this patch.
>
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 6 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 3 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------
> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> index dd5ca343c469..c1157917a814 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int cmt_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test,
> const struct user_param
> static bool cmt_feature_check(const struct resctrl_test *test)
> {
> return test_resource_feature_check(test) &&
> - validate_resctrl_feature_request("L3_MON", "llc_occupancy");
> + resctrl_resource_exists("L3");
This not correctly transformed.
> +/*
> + * resctrl_mon_feature_exists - Check if requested monitoring L3_MON feature
> is valid.
> + * @feature: Required monitor feature (in mon_features file).
> + *
> + * Return: True if the feature is supported, else false.
> + */
> +bool resctrl_mon_feature_exists(const char *feature)
> +{
> + char *res;
> + FILE *inf;
> +
> if (!feature)
> - return true;
> + return false;
>
> - snprintf(res_path, sizeof(res_path), "%s/%s/mon_features", INFO_PATH,
> resource);
> - inf = fopen(res_path, "r");
> + inf = fopen("/sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mon_features", "r");
This became less generic? Could there be other MON resource besides L3
one? Perhaps there aren't today but why remove the ability give it as a
parameter?
--
i.
