On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 11:17 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:45:28 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > But I'm pretty sure that even with that there will be sporadic failures > > in slow enough environments. > > > > When the host-induced jitter/delay is high enough, packets are dropped > > and there are functional failures. I'm wondering if we should skip this > > test entirely when KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW=yes. > > By skip do you mean the same approach as to the gro test? > Ignore errors? Because keeping the code coverage for KASAN etc. > would still be good (stating the obvious, sorry).
I see my wording was not clear/misleading, I'm sorry. Yes, I mean checking KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW in the caller script and ignoring errors. Cheers, Paolo
