On 12/02/2024 19:13, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:32:58AM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> On 10/02/2024 12:35, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Ah, I was assuming that some of the suite ran usefully as non-root given >>> that the only point of that sudo was to acquire root. If the whole >>> thing needs to be root then we should instead have a check for root at >>> the top of run_vmtests.sh and just skip the whole thing if we aren't >>> root, but then I'm unclear why it's invoking sudo in the first place. > >> I can't speak for how others use the suite, but there are a bunch of setup >> operations in the script itself that require root (e.g. reserving huge >> pages). >> Some of the tests will work without root, I'm sure, but I'm not sure its >> hugely >> valuable. Personally, I'd vote for just doing a test for root at the top, as >> you >> suggest. > > The hugetlb tests appear to be checking for root while running... I'm > not super fussed either way myself, I don't really use these tests > myself except in a general "keeping an eye on CI" kind of way so I'd not > object if people wanted to just go for just requiring root for the whole > thing.
My vote is to keep it simple and require root for the whole thing.
