No code change, but it'll allow to have only one place to change
everything when we add in_sleepable in cur_state.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>

---

no changes in v3

changes in v2 (compared to the one attaches to v1 0/9):
- dropped the cur_state flag, so it can be put first
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 88e9d2e4c29f..7a4b19bea2ac 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5255,6 +5255,11 @@ static int map_kptr_match_type(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env,
        return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static bool in_sleepable(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+       return env->prog->aux->sleepable;
+}
+
 /* The non-sleepable programs and sleepable programs with explicit 
bpf_rcu_read_lock()
  * can dereference RCU protected pointers and result is PTR_TRUSTED.
  */
@@ -5262,7 +5267,7 @@ static bool in_rcu_cs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
        return env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock ||
               env->cur_state->active_lock.ptr ||
-              !env->prog->aux->sleepable;
+              !in_sleepable(env);
 }
 
 /* Once GCC supports btf_type_tag the following mechanism will be replaced 
with tag check */
@@ -10164,7 +10169,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, struct bpf_insn *insn
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       if (!env->prog->aux->sleepable && fn->might_sleep) {
+       if (!in_sleepable(env) && fn->might_sleep) {
                verbose(env, "helper call might sleep in a non-sleepable 
prog\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
@@ -10194,7 +10199,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, struct bpf_insn *insn
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
 
-               if (env->prog->aux->sleepable && 
is_storage_get_function(func_id))
+               if (in_sleepable(env) && is_storage_get_function(func_id))
                        env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].storage_get_func_atomic = 
true;
        }
 
@@ -11535,7 +11540,7 @@ static bool check_css_task_iter_allowlist(struct 
bpf_verifier_env *env)
                        return true;
                fallthrough;
        default:
-               return env->prog->aux->sleepable;
+               return in_sleepable(env);
        }
 }
 
@@ -12056,7 +12061,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
        }
 
        sleepable = is_kfunc_sleepable(&meta);
-       if (sleepable && !env->prog->aux->sleepable) {
+       if (sleepable && !in_sleepable(env)) {
                verbose(env, "program must be sleepable to call sleepable kfunc 
%s\n", func_name);
                return -EACCES;
        }
@@ -18193,7 +18198,7 @@ static int resolve_pseudo_ldimm64(struct 
bpf_verifier_env *env)
                                return -E2BIG;
                        }
 
-                       if (env->prog->aux->sleepable)
+                       if (in_sleepable(env))
                                atomic64_inc(&map->sleepable_refcnt);
                        /* hold the map. If the program is rejected by verifier,
                         * the map will be released by release_maps() or it
@@ -19669,7 +19674,7 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
                }
 
                if (is_storage_get_function(insn->imm)) {
-                       if (!env->prog->aux->sleepable ||
+                       if (!in_sleepable(env) ||
                            env->insn_aux_data[i + 
delta].storage_get_func_atomic)
                                insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, (__force 
__s32)GFP_ATOMIC);
                        else

-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to