On 20.02.2024 08:46, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 20:41, Paul Heidekrüger <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I was running some KASan tests with kunit.py recently and noticed that
> > when KASan is run in hw tags mode, we manually have to add the required
> > `mte=on` option to kunit_tool's qemu invocation, as the tests will
> > otherwise crash.
> >
> > To make life easier, I was looking into ways for kunit.py to recognise
> > when MTE support was required and set the option automatically.
> >
> > All solutions I could come up with for having kunit_tool conditionally
> > pass `mte=on` to qemu, either entailed duplicate code or required
> > parsing of kernel's config file again. I was working under the
> > assumption that only after configuring the kernel we would know whether
> > the 'mte=on' option was necessary, as CONFIG_ARM64_MTE is not visible
> > before.
> >
> > Only afterwads did I realise that the qemu arm64 config that kunit_tool
> > falls back on, uses the `virt` machine, which supports MTE in any case.
> > So, could it be as easy as just adding the `mte=on` option to
> > kunit_tool's arm64 config? Would this be a welcome addition?
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Heidekrüger <[email protected]>
> > ---
> 
> I think this is fine. I'd be a little bit concerned if this were only
> supported in newer qemu versions, but it seems to go back to 6.2, so
> should be okay. I think it's better to just enable it unconditionally
> by default rather than trying to parse the config.
> 
> The KASAN tests seemed to work fine with HW tags in my testing here. I
> do wonder if there's a way to make the tests skip themselves if MTE
> isn't available: is there a way of doing a runtime check for this?

Huh, interesting. Even though "mte=on" isn't set on your side?

I get the following output without the MTE patch.

        ➜   ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 
--kunitconfig=mm/kasan/.kunitconfig --arch=arm64
        [14:08:11] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
        [14:08:11] Building KUnit Kernel ...
        Populating config with:
        $ make ARCH=arm64 O=.kunit olddefconfig
        Building with:
        $ make ARCH=arm64 O=.kunit --jobs=8
        [14:08:23] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
        [14:08:23] ============================================================
        Running tests with:
        $ qemu-system-aarch64 -nodefaults -m 1024 -kernel 
.kunit/arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz -append 'kunit.enable=1 console=ttyAMA0 
kunit_shutdown=reboot' -no-reboot -nographic -serial stdio -machine virt -cpu 
max,pauth-impdef=on
        [14:08:23] kasan: test: Can't run KASAN tests with KASAN disabled
        [14:08:23]     # kasan:     # failed to initialize (-1)
        [14:08:23] [FAILED] kasan
        [14:08:23] ============================================================
        [14:08:23] Testing complete. Ran 1 tests: failed: 1
        [14:08:24] Elapsed time: 12.374s total, 0.001s configuring, 11.937s 
building, 0.382s running

Where the mentioned .kunitconfig has the following options set for KASan.

        CONFIG_KUNIT=y
        CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=n

        CONFIG_FTRACE=y
        CONFIG_STACK_TRACER=y 

        CONFIG_KASAN=y
        CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS=y
        CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST=y

With the MTE patch from my previous email, everything works just fine.

Based on that, do you have a guess why it's working for you and why it isn't 
for 
me?

> Regardless, this is:
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>

Thanks! I'll be sending a non-RFC patch shortly.

Many thanks,
Paul


Reply via email to