Thanks for the patch. The patch should have been sent to a separate new thread.
On 3/14/24 5:22 PM, Dev Jain wrote: > mmap() must not succeed in validate_lower_address_hint(), for if it does, it > is a bug in mmap() itself. Reflect this behaviour with ksft_exit_fail_msg(). > While at it, do some formatting changes. > > Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c | 12 +++++------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c > b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c > index 7bcf8d48256a..426ddfc345fb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int validate_lower_address_hint(void) > char *ptr; > > ptr = mmap((void *) (1UL << 45), MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | > - PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > + PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > > if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) > return 0; > @@ -105,13 +105,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_LOW; i++) { > ptr[i] = mmap(NULL, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > - MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > > if (ptr[i] == MAP_FAILED) { > - if (validate_lower_address_hint()) { > - ksft_test_result_skip("Memory constraint not > fulfilled\n"); > - ksft_finished(); > - } > + if (validate_lower_address_hint()) > + ksft_exit_fail_msg("mmap unexpectedly succeeded > with hint\n"); > break; > } > > @@ -127,7 +125,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_HIGH; i++) { > hint = hind_addr(); > hptr[i] = mmap(hint, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > - MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > > if (hptr[i] == MAP_FAILED) > break; -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum
