On 6/4/2024 3:47 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2024, Manali Shukla wrote: >> On 5/1/2024 9:02 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> On Wed, May 01, 2024, Manali Shukla wrote: >>>> PMU event filter test fails on zen4 architecture because of >>>> unavailability of family and model check for zen4 in use_amd_pmu(). >>>> So, add family and model check for zen4 architecture in use_amd_pmu(). >>> >>> Is there a less ugly way to detect that 0xc2,0 == "branch instructions >>> retired"? >>> E.g. can we instead check for v2 PMU support, or are there no guarantees >>> going >>> forward? Pivoting on FMS is so painful :-( >> >> We have confirmed with the hardware team that 0xc2,0 == "branch instructions >> retired" >> is always true going forward, we intend to maintain backward compatibility >> for branch >> instruction retired. Since event 0xc2 is supported on all currently released >> F17h+ >> processors as branch instructions retired, we can check for "family >= 0x17" >> for all >> Zen and its successors instead of checking them individually in >> pmu_event_filter_test.c. > > Can you send a patch for this? Please :-)
Sent. https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/[email protected]/T/#u -Manali
