On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:31:45 +0100,
Shaoqin Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If we don't care about the FEAT_CNTSC right now. Could I fix the
> compile issue and respin this again without the background of enabling
> migration between MtCollins and AmpereOne, and just keep the
> information of the different BT field between different machine?
As I said, I think this patch is valuable. But maybe you should
consider tackling the full register, rather than only addressing a
single field.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
