On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 10:38 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
[...]
I think that this patch is an improvement independent of the patch-set.
Please submit it separately.
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
[...]
> @@ -489,6 +494,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
> ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
>
> bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +err:
Nit: there are two links in this test, but ASSERT_OK_PTR is added only
for a single one. Also note that bpf_link__destroy(NULL) works
just fine, so it is possible to initialize links as NULL and make
a jump to cleanup block w/o peeking exact position within that block.
> bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
> tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
> }
[...]