On 7/8/24 12:15 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 10:29 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:

[...]

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h
index fcda6b2333ad..14d161d35248 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ typedef __u16 __sum16;
  struct network_helper_opts {
        int timeout_ms;
        bool must_fail;
+       int expect_errno;

I think this option obfuscates actual test cases.
Each helper that accepts network_helper_opts as a parameter, does
multiple system calls. It is not obvious which of these calls is
expected to fail.

+1

Please no. On top of that, handling specific errno is not something that belongs to the generic network_helpers.c. The individual test should check for the errno that it expects on the error path.

Is it for make_client()? The caller of make_client can check the errno instead, 
no?

[ The same goes for the existing "bool must_fail;" but it can be left for a separate cleanup patch ]

pw-bot: cr


        int proto;
        /* The backlog argument for listen(), defines the maximum length to 
which
         * the queue of pending connections for sockfd may grow.

[...]


Reply via email to