On 7/30/24 4:59 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
+static void test_read(const char *path, char *buf, int buf_size,
+                     int expected_ret)
+{
+       int ret, fd;
+
+       fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+
+       /* A bare open on unauthorized device should fail */
+       if (expected_ret < 0) {
+               ASSERT_EQ(fd, expected_ret, "open file for read");

One nit. expected_ret is actually expected_errno. It just happens -EPERM is -1, so testing fd against expected_errno works here but is confusing to read. How about separating the fd and errno test in the access rejected case. First test for fd == -1 and then test for errno == expected_errno.

Please also carry Stanislav's Ack in patch 1 and 3 in the next respin.

Thanks for helping to move this test to test_progs.

pw-bot: cr

+               if (fd >= 0)
+                       close(fd);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(fd, "open file for read"))
+               return;
+
+       ret = read(fd, buf, buf_size);
+       ASSERT_EQ(ret, expected_ret, "read");
+
+       close(fd);
+}
+
+static void test_write(const char *path, char *buf, int buf_size,
+                      int expected_ret)
+{
+       int ret, fd;
+
+       fd = open(path, O_WRONLY);
+
+       /* A bare open on unauthorized device should fail */
+       if (expected_ret < 0) {
+               ASSERT_EQ(fd, expected_ret, "open file for write");
+               if (fd >= 0)
+                       close(fd);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(fd, "open file for write"))
+               return;
+
+       ret = write(fd, buf, buf_size);
+       ASSERT_EQ(ret, expected_ret, "write");
+
+       close(fd);
+}
+
+void test_cgroup_dev(void)
+{
+       char buf[TEST_BUFFER_SIZE] = "some random test data";
+       struct dev_cgroup *skel;
+       int cgroup_fd;
+
+       cgroup_fd = cgroup_setup_and_join(TEST_CGROUP);
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "cgroup switch"))
+               return;
+
+       skel = dev_cgroup__open_and_load();
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "load program"))
+               goto cleanup_cgroup;
+
+       skel->links.bpf_prog1 =
+               bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bpf_prog1, cgroup_fd);
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.bpf_prog1, "attach_program"))
+               goto cleanup_progs;
+
+       if (test__start_subtest("allow-mknod"))
+               test_mknod("/dev/test_dev_cgroup_null", S_IFCHR, 1, 3, 0);
+
+       if (test__start_subtest("allow-read"))
+               test_read("/dev/urandom", buf, TEST_BUFFER_SIZE,
+                         TEST_BUFFER_SIZE);
+
+       if (test__start_subtest("allow-write"))
+               test_write("/dev/null", buf, TEST_BUFFER_SIZE,
+                          TEST_BUFFER_SIZE);
+
+       if (test__start_subtest("deny-mknod"))
+               test_mknod("/dev/test_dev_cgroup_zero", S_IFCHR, 1, 5, -EPERM);
+
+       if (test__start_subtest("deny-read"))
+               test_read("/dev/random", buf, TEST_BUFFER_SIZE, -EPERM);
+
+       if (test__start_subtest("deny-write"))
+               test_write("/dev/zero", buf, TEST_BUFFER_SIZE, -EPERM);
+
+cleanup_progs:
+       dev_cgroup__destroy(skel);
+cleanup_cgroup:
+       cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+}



Reply via email to