Jeff... come on now.

Please cc- the reviewers of mm/mmap.c on these patches - that's me,
Vlastimil and Liam. Same for mm/vma.c, mm/vma.h, mm/vma_internal.h.

And it seems like it should be pretty obvious you should cc- Liam when it's
quite literally his code you're changing!

Relevant section from MAINTAINERS:

MEMORY MAPPING
M:      Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
R:      Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]>
R:      Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
R:      Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
L:      [email protected]
S:      Maintained
W:      http://www.linux-mm.org
T:      git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
F:      mm/mmap.c

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:55:21PM GMT, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Jeff Xu <[email protected]>
>
> mmap(MAP_FIXED) should return EPERM when memory is sealed.
>
> Fixes: 4205a39e06da ("mm/munmap: replace can_modify_mm with can_modify_vma")
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 80d70ed099cf..0cd0c0ef03c7 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -1386,7 +1386,10 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned 
> long addr,
>               mt_on_stack(mt_detach);
>               mas_init(&mas_detach, &mt_detach, /* addr = */ 0);
>               /* Prepare to unmap any existing mapping in the area */
> -             if (vms_gather_munmap_vmas(&vms, &mas_detach))
> +             error = vms_gather_munmap_vmas(&vms, &mas_detach);
> +             if (error == -EPERM)
> +                     return -EPERM;
> +             if (error)
>                       return -ENOMEM;

Can't we just return the error here?

This is one for Liam, but I'm ostensibly in favour, this does seem valid!

>
>               vmg.next = vms.next;
> --
> 2.46.0.295.g3b9ea8a38a-goog
>

Reply via email to