On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 10:45 PM Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jason Xing wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 9:38 PM Willem de Bruijn > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Jason Xing wrote: > > > > From: Jason Xing <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE is a report flag which passes the > > > > timestamps generated by either SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE or > > > > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE to the userspace all the time. > > > > > > > > So let us revise the doc here. > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <[email protected]> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> > > > > > > As an exception to the rule, as a one word fix, can be squashed into > > > the feature patch, I think. > > > > > > > --- > > > > Link: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > > > Please put these at the top of the Suggested-by/Signed-off-by/..-by > > > block. Their more useful to future readers than to current followers > > > of the mailing list. > > > > But I have to ask if it looks a little messy if the first patch will > > grow much bigger than before with adding some suggested-by tags and > > links, and a separate paragraph to explain why we touch the doc... > > > > Cooking one patch which saves my much energy is surely easier for me > > but not for readers probably, I assume. > > Ok. This small patch can even be stand-alone. No need for a series. >
Got it. I will send it as a standalone patch tomorrow since I need to wait more than 24 hours.
