On 11/15/24 13:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
The testing effort is increasing throughout the community.
The tests are generally merged into the subsystem trees,
and are of relatively narrow interest. The patch volume on
[email protected] makes it hard to follow
the changes to the framework, and discuss proposals.
Create a new ML focused on the framework of kselftests,
which will hopefully be similarly low volume to the workflows@
mailing list.
From the responses to v1 I gather that the preference is to
keep the existing list for all (or create an alias to it);
the framework-only section should be the one to have a new
list created.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
---
Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive
but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very
least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer.
Posting as an RFC because we need to create the new ML.
I have to repeat the same thing I said when you sent RFC v1
It is going to add the confusion - people don't cc the one mailing list
we have now.
I am going to have to say no. Sorry.
thanks,
-- Shuah
