On Thu, 2025-04-10 at 14:10 +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > > Thank you for following up on this. It's definitely not getting > cleaner with a bond > ptr in xfrm protected by two locks in different drivers, but it > should do AFAICT. > In case there is another version I'd add a big comment of the locking > expectations > for real_dev, and maybe in the future it can fully move to the > bonding as well. > > For the set: > Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Thanks for the review, I'll send v3 with the comment added. I would have liked to push this a bit further with making real_dev private, but I didn't find a way and that can be done separately. Cosmin.
