On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 4:08 PM Alex Williamson
<alex.william...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2025 23:29:49 +0000
> David Matlack <dmatl...@google.com> wrote:
> > +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > +     char *bdf;
> > +
> > +     if (argc != 2) {
> > +             printf("Usage: %s bus:device:function\n", argv[0]);
>
> segment:bus:device.function?

Oops, yes. Will fix in the next version.

>
> > +             return 1;
>
> 1 or KSFT_FAIL?

Yeah KSFT_FAIL is probably the better option.

Thanks.

Reply via email to