Willem points out TOTAL_HDR_LEN is identical to MAX_HDR_LEN. This seems to have been the case ever since the test was added. Replace the uses of TOTAL_HDR_LEN with MAX_HDR_LEN, MAX seems more common for what this value is.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/gro.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/gro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/gro.c index 57080ecc3df8..3616ecc42a01 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/gro.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/gro.c @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ #define START_SEQ 100 #define START_ACK 100 #define ETH_P_NONE 0 -#define TOTAL_HDR_LEN (ETH_HLEN + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + sizeof(struct tcphdr)) #define MSS (4096 - sizeof(struct tcphdr) - sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)) #define MAX_PAYLOAD (IP_MAXPACKET - sizeof(struct tcphdr) - sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)) #define NUM_LARGE_PKT (MAX_PAYLOAD / MSS) @@ -526,9 +525,9 @@ static void send_data_pkts(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, */ static void send_large(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, int remainder) { - static char pkts[NUM_LARGE_PKT][TOTAL_HDR_LEN + MSS]; - static char last[TOTAL_HDR_LEN + MSS]; - static char new_seg[TOTAL_HDR_LEN + MSS]; + static char pkts[NUM_LARGE_PKT][MAX_HDR_LEN + MSS]; + static char last[MAX_HDR_LEN + MSS]; + static char new_seg[MAX_HDR_LEN + MSS]; int i; for (i = 0; i < NUM_LARGE_PKT; i++) -- 2.53.0
