On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:58:04 +0900 chanyoung wrote: > 2026-07-27, 12:30:48 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > > This should never happen. We need to fix whatever path leads to that > > invalid condition. > > Your diff is right. Tested on net (53658c6f3682), stock config: without it > the test in 2/2 oopses in the AEAD walk, with it applied there is no oops > and no regression in the tls selftests. > > Agreed, my patch was treating the symptom. > > Sorry about the verbosity of v1. > > Happy to send a v2 with your diff if you'd like me to carry it, or leave > it to you. Should Fixes: stay at fe1e81d4f73b?
Please send a v2, I don't see anyone else sending a fix for this.
