On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 02:16:50PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 06:48:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > TBH when I said in the commit log I was thinking of something more data > > driven I was thinking more of having the dependencies expressed as pure > > data, more like the way the test in set_id_regs is written. This also > > seems fine to me, the checks are similar. It's just much more invasive. > Indeed. Perhaps the config.c approach will make it easier to convert JSON > -> code also? I'm not sure how much of a difference it makes given that there's still code for the actual dependency set.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
