Eh? según lo que me acabas de poner no estoy equivocado: > No portion of the server will be > closed source including backup, encryption, or any storage engines we > ship
¿ ...o que fue lo que quisiste decir? o.O On Thursday 08 May 2008 10:01:00 am Carlos Javier Borroto wrote: > 2008/5/8 Miguel Angel Iglesias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ya eso es un poco viejo, y según entendí NO VAN A CERRAR NADA, sino que > > van a hacer *nuevas* funcionalidades no abiertas para la version > > enterprise, por favor sabe alguien si estoy equivocado? > > Según slashdot[1] si: > > MySQL Reverses Decision On Closed Source > Posted by kdawson on Tuesday May 06, @05:40PM > from the good-on-them dept. > Sun Microsystems Databases Software > krow writes "I am very happy to be announcing that MySQL will be > forgoing close sourcing portions of the MySQL Server. Kaj has the > official statement in his blog. No portion of the server will be > closed source including backup, encryption, or any storage engines we > ship. To quote Kaj 'The encryption and compression backup features > will be open source.' This is a change from what was previously posted > here on Slashdot. I've posted some additional thoughts on my own blog > concerning how we keep open source from becoming crippleware. Word has > it that we will also have a panel at this year's OSCON discussing this > topic. Contrary to the previous Slashdot discussion, this shows Sun's > continued commitment to Open Source." > > [1]http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/06/2125235&from=rss _______________________________________________ Cancelar suscripción https://listas.softwarelibre.cu/mailman/listinfo/linux-l Buscar en el archivo http://listas.softwarelibre.cu/buscar/linux-l
