You're right, of course. I thought there might be a more sinister
reason: that MS had, somehow, incredibly, managed to keep the inner
workings of NTFS secret all these years.
And I feel, as possibly the World's Worst Programmer, that I'm
doing humanity a favor by keeping my code OUT of the public
domain. :-) (Not that I've ever actually written any for
NTFS...)
Rich wrote:
>
>Scott Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Why doesn't Linux do NTFS?!?
>
><smile, I'm half joking>
>Because you haven't started working on it yet? You know what they say
>about the squeaky wheel, in Linux the grease is the right to add what
>is missing.
></smile, I'm half joking>
>
>Read this and see if it suits your needs. If not, see advice
>above. ;-)
>
>http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~loewis/ntfs/
>
>rw2
>
