Hello

Any update regarding to this patch?


Thanks!

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The current code expected that every LED had an unique name. This is a
> legit expectation when the device tree can no be modified or extended.
> But with device tree overlays this requirement can be easily broken.
>
> This patch finds out if the name is already in use and adds the suffix
> _1, _2... if not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Suggested by Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
>
> -move name search to separated function
> -Iterate on class
>  drivers/leds/led-class.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> index 795ec99..5c6505a 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,29 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops leds_class_dev_pm_ops = {
>         .resume         = led_resume,
>  };
>
> +static int match_name(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> +{
> +       if (!dev_name(dev))
> +               return 0;
> +       return !strcmp(dev_name(dev), (char *)data);
> +}
> +
> +static char *led_classdev_next_name(const char *init_name)
> +{
> +       char *name = (char *) init_name;
> +       int i = 0;
> +
> +       while (class_find_device(leds_class, NULL, name, match_name)) {
> +               if (name != init_name)
> +                       kfree(name);
> +               name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s_%d", init_name, ++i);
> +               if (!name)
> +                       return NULL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return name;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * led_classdev_register - register a new object of led_classdev class.
>   * @parent: The device to register.
> @@ -219,12 +242,23 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops leds_class_dev_pm_ops = {
>   */
>  int led_classdev_register(struct device *parent, struct led_classdev 
> *led_cdev)
>  {
> +       char *name = led_classdev_next_name(led_cdev->name);
> +
> +       if (!name)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
>         led_cdev->dev = device_create_with_groups(leds_class, parent, 0,
> -                                       led_cdev, led_cdev->groups,
> -                                       "%s", led_cdev->name);
> +                                       led_cdev, led_cdev->groups, name);
> +       if (name != led_cdev->name)
> +               kfree(name);
> +
>         if (IS_ERR(led_cdev->dev))
>                 return PTR_ERR(led_cdev->dev);
>
> +       if (name != led_cdev->name)
> +               dev_info(parent, "Led %s renamed to %s due to name collision",
> +                               led_cdev->name, dev_name(led_cdev->dev));
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS
>         init_rwsem(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
>  #endif
> --
> 2.1.4
>



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to