On Tue 2015-04-07 18:20:08, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> >>+- flash-timeout-us : Timeout in microseconds after which the flash
> >> >>+ LED is turned off. If omitted this will default to
> >> >>the
> >> >>+ maximum timeout allowed by the device.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Examples:
> >> >
> >> >Pavel pointed out that the brightness between maximum current and the
> >> >maximum *allowed* another current might not be noticeable,leading a
> >> >potential spelling error to cause the LED being run at too high current.
> >>
> >> Where did he point this out? Do you think about the current version
> >> of the leds/common.txt documentation or there was some other message,
> >> that I don't see?
> >
> > Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:30:44 +0200
> > From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> > To: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] media: i2c/adp1653: devicetree support for adp1653
> >
> >> Besides, I can't understand your point. Could you express it in other
> >> words, please?
> >
> > Typo in device tree would cause hardware damage. But idea. Make the
> > properties mandatory.
> > Pavel
>
> I don't quite follow there. I think Pavel acked this patch right? So
> what's left to hold here?
Yeah. Then I realized that patch is wrong/dangerous. Sorry about
that. Try to forget about my ACK if you can ;-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
