On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 04/14/2015 11:23 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>
>> In gpio_leds_create(), when devm_get_gpiod_from_child() fails with
>> -EPROBE_DEFER on the second gpio led to be created, the first already
>> registered led is not torn down properly. This causes create_gpio_led()
>> to fail for the first led on re-probe().
>>
>> Fix this misbehaviour by incrementing num_leds only if all
>> potentially failing calls completed successfully.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Cc: Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> ---
>>   drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> For this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <[email protected]>
>

Thanks, I merged it.
-Bryan

> I have a question regarding the sequence above on line 201:
>
> if (!led.name)
>         return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> Shouldn't this be also 'goto err"?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to