Hi Boris,
Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2015, 10:21:58 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> Implement the ->init_state() function to expose initial state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
> ---
[...]
> @@ -98,6 +110,36 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2(struct pwm_chip
> *chip, writel_relaxed(val, pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
> }
>
> +static void rockchip_pwm_init_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip);
> + unsigned long clk_rate;
> + u64 tmp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_enable(pc->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
> +
> + tmp = readl(pc->base + pc->data->regs.period);
> + tmp *= pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + tmp = do_div(tmp, clk_rate);
I guess you want to have the division result here and not the remainder, so
- tmp = do_div(tmp, clk_rate);
+ do_div(tmp, clk_rate);
> + pwm->state.period = tmp;
> +
> + tmp = readl(pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty);
> + tmp *= pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + tmp = do_div(tmp, clk_rate);
ditto
> + pwm->state.duty_cycle = tmp;
> +
> + pc->data->init(chip, chip->pwms);
> +
> + if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
> + clk_disable(pc->clk);
> +}
> +
> static int rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
> *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> {
> @@ -171,6 +213,7 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct pwm_device *pwm) }
>
> static const struct pwm_ops rockchip_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> + .init_state = rockchip_pwm_init_state,
> .config = rockchip_pwm_config,
> .enable = rockchip_pwm_enable,
> .disable = rockchip_pwm_disable,
> @@ -178,6 +221,7 @@ static const struct pwm_ops rockchip_pwm_ops_v1 = {
> };
>
> static const struct pwm_ops rockchip_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> + .init_state = rockchip_pwm_init_state,
> .config = rockchip_pwm_config,
> .set_polarity = rockchip_pwm_set_polarity,
> .enable = rockchip_pwm_enable,
> @@ -195,6 +239,7 @@ static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v1 = {
> .prescaler = 2,
> .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v1,
> .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> + .init = rockchip_pwm_init_v1,
> };
>
> static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
> @@ -207,6 +252,7 @@ static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
> .prescaler = 1,
> .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v2,
> .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> + .init = rockchip_pwm_init_v2,
you're referencing the v2 init here, but only add it in the next patch?
[pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update]
> };
>
> static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
> @@ -219,6 +265,7 @@ static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
> .prescaler = 1,
> .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v2,
> .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> + .init = rockchip_pwm_init_v2,
ditto
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
