Hi Muhammad,
On 10/17/2015 01:32 AM, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote:
Use devm_led_classdev_register instead of led_classdev_register,
removing the redundant net48xx_led_remove function.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
---
drivers/leds/leds-net48xx.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-net48xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-net48xx.c
index ec3a2e8..0d214c2 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-net48xx.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-net48xx.c
@@ -39,18 +39,11 @@ static struct led_classdev net48xx_error_led = {
static int net48xx_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- return led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &net48xx_error_led);
-}
-
-static int net48xx_led_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- led_classdev_unregister(&net48xx_error_led);
- return 0;
+ return devm_led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &net48xx_error_led);
}
static struct platform_driver net48xx_led_driver = {
.probe = net48xx_led_probe,
- .remove = net48xx_led_remove,
.driver = {
.name = DRVNAME,
},
Applied, thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
