On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 21:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jan 3, 2011, Felipe Sanches <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What I meant is that the kernel source shouldnt ship binaries. > > Why not? It doesn't harm any freedom to ship them along with the > sources, and it makes perfect sense IMHO to not require people who build > their own kernel binaries to have to have assemblers and compilers and > FPGA tools etc for tons of different targets. >
Happy gnu year fsfla.org! You mean the : http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.36.2-libre/deblob-2.6.36 http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.36.2-libre/deblob-check http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.36.2-libre/deblob-main are affected too? -- Aurelien DESBRIERES http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/User:Aurelien Freedom is not just a word, it's a duty. _______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
