On Nov 20, 2015, Mikko Viinamäki <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/20/2015 05:28 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> It would be nice to check in the syslog whether there are >> wpa_supplicant errors after each block of kernel errors. This would >> confirm my theory.
> Is this the smoking gun? https://trisquel.info/en/issues/15696#comment-82419 Not quite. There's only one block of requests there. Although that's compatible with the theory, it doesn't confirm that the wpa_supplicant errors occur after every block of a certain number of kernel errors, which would in turn suggest that the retries are initiated by wpa_supplicant rather than by the kernel. Even that wouldn't be a smoking gun, though; it might still be possible that some part of the kernel I haven't looked at initiated each block of errors and then signaled wpa_supplicant, without the latter having requested for a retry. But that's not how kernel and wpa_supplicant are supposed to work; so the theory that the latter initiates the retries makes a lot more sense to me. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer _______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
