On Jul 21, 2017, Kouta Ikematsu <[email protected]> wrote:
> I try "rpm -qi freed-ora-release" and "rpm -qi freed-ora-freedom", > this package license is BSD license. > Question: Which is "BSD" License ? Being a package for Fedora, originally based on a Fedora package, it follows the Fedora license-naming conventions. Which, admittedly, doesn't answer your question. Now, considering there's nothing worthy of copyrights in the package (it's just a collection of facts, such as conflict-markers and yum/dnf repo configurations), it doesn't matter too much what the named license is. Maybe I'm being too sloppy. I considered GPLing it, but then I'd have to add a copy of the GPL and multiply by several times the size of the package, which didn't seem worth it. Any suggestions? -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer _______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
