Hello Alexandre, El 2020-05-07 09:59, Alexandre Oliva escribió:
# Tarballs We'd keep on creating and publishing tarballs, at least for now. I'm not sure whether it makes sense to create all of .bz2, .xz and .lz, though. Please let me know whether you rely on any of these formats; we'd keep them mainly for backward-compatibility, since any of them could/would from now on be created from the git repo with git archive.
I'm not sure I understand how the new process for getting linux-libre will work. In Dragora (as maintainer) I depend on the linux-libre tarball to compile and then distribute it, specifically in the lzip format. Cloning the git-based repository or getting tarballs from there (using the links it provides) could be a drawback in terms of time and resources (machine). Currently, it's not a problem for me to have the resource on the machine itself, but cloning a repository on old machines could be a problem.
However it seems a good move for the deblob scripts tracking. :-) _______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
