On Monday 08 February 2016 14:05:24 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Well, yes, but since in my case the cache is bigger than the origin,
> shouldn't eventually *everything* end-up in the cache?
IIRC you lowered *_promote_adjustment, but still full copy may be prevented by
sequential_threshold setting.
And how many blocks you have in cache after boot? [1]
Is number rising every boot?
Can you verify cache settings? [2]
[1]:
lvs -o+cache_total_blocks,cache_used_blocks,cache_dirty_blocks,
cache_read_hits,cache_read_misses,cache_write_hits,cache_write_misses,lv_health_status
[2]:
dmsetup status VG-LV
lvs -o+cache_policy,cache_settings,chunksize VG/LV
--
Mateusz Korniak
"(...) mam brata - poważny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobożniś,
krótko mówiąc - podpora społeczeństwa."
Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/