Xen wrote:

> The issue with scripts is that they feel rather vulnerable to  corruption, 
> not being there etc.

Only you are responsible for making sure scripts are available and correctly 
written.

>  So in that case I suppose that you would want some default, shipped  scripts 
> that come with LVM as
> example for default behaviour and that are  also activated by default?
...
> /usr/share/lvm/scripts/

Heck no to activation. The only path that's correct is that last one. The 
previously supplied example code should have been more than enough for you to 
venture out on your own and write custom logic.
 
> Then not even a threshold value needs to be configured.

Nobody else wants your particular logic, run interval, or thresholds. Write 
your scripts to suck in /etc/sysconfig/lvm/<vgname> or whatever the distro of 
your choice puts such things.
 
> Yes. One obvious scenario is root on thin.
> It's pretty mandatory for root on thin.

Can you elaborate with an example? Because that's the most dangerous one not to 
have space fully reserved unless you've established other means to ensure 
nothing writes to that volume or the writes are very, very well defined. ie. 
'yum update' is disabled, nobody has root, the filesystem is mounted RO, etc.
 
>  You cannot set max size for thin snapshots?

And you want to do that to 'root' volumes?!?!
 
> you cannot calculate in advance what can  happen,
> because by design, mayhem should not ensue, but what if your
> predictions are off?

Simple. You don't do stupid things like NOT reserving 100% of space in a thinLV 
for all root volumes. You buy as many hard drives as necessary so you don't get 
burned.

> Being able to set a maximum snapshot size before it gets dropped could  be 
> very nice.

Write your own script that queries all volumes, and destroys those that are 
beyond your high-water mark unless optionally they are "special".

> When free space on thin pool drops below ~120MB

At best your user-space program runs each minute and writing 120MB takes a 
couple seconds and thus between runs of your 'monitor' you've blown past any 
chance of taking action.

8TB drives are $250 bucks. buy disk. and buy more disk already and quadruple 
your notion of reserves. If your workload isn't critical then nobody cares if 
you blow it sky high and you can do silly things like shaving too close. But I 
have to ask, to what possible purpose?

> I want the 20GB volume  and the 10GB volumes to be frozen

It takes time for a script log into each KVM domain and issue an fsfreeze or 
even to just suspend the VM from the hypervisor. Meanwhile writers are 
potentially writing at several hundred MB per second. You're looking at a 
massive torrent of write errors.

> much deleted

Sounds like you got all the bits figured out. Write the script and post it to 
GitHub or PasteBin.


> so that the burden on the administrator is very minimal.

No sysadmin worth a damn is going to not spend a LOT of time thinking whether 
this sort of thing is even rational, and if so, where they want to draw the 
line. This sort of behavior doesn't suffer fools gladly nor is it appropriate 
for people to attempt who don't first know what they are doing. Some parts of 
Linux/Unix are Experts-Only for a reason.

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

Reply via email to