Hi, > Hmm would it be possible that associated thin pool would be in some erroneous > condition - i.e. out-of-space - or processing some resize ?
The testing model is: create/mount/"do IO" (on) thin LV; and then umount/delete thin LV. doing this work flow in parallel. > This likely could result into some significant processing delay ? > > Since you are using very ancient lvm2 (2.02.130) we have heavily improved > logic for such pools over the time... Hah, I think I've mentioned this issue can be reproduced on centos 7.6 (2.02.180). Regards, Eric _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
